1. 響應(yīng)式網(wǎng)站，即網(wǎng)站的域名和URL都不變，只是根據(jù)瀏覽設(shè)備而自動(dòng)調(diào)整頁(yè)面的大小和內(nèi)容，這主要是靠HTML5和CSS代碼實(shí)現(xiàn)的。 2. 網(wǎng)站的域名和URL不變，但是根據(jù)用戶(hù)的設(shè)備來(lái)進(jìn)行判斷，給用戶(hù)不同的頁(yè)面，即URL不變，但是HTML頁(yè)面發(fā)生了變化。 3. 啟用新的子域名，根據(jù)用戶(hù)的設(shè)備來(lái)進(jìn)行判斷，然后進(jìn)行跳轉(zhuǎn)。 第一種方式是最佳的方式，但也是最難的，有很多的挑戰(zhàn)。普遍采用的是第三種方式，這種方式從網(wǎng)站優(yōu)化上和成本上都不是非常好，但是客觀現(xiàn)實(shí)的影響，卻比較普遍。還有就是國(guó)內(nèi)的移動(dòng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的網(wǎng)速實(shí)際還比較慢，所以移動(dòng)端的網(wǎng)站需要進(jìn)行精簡(jiǎn)，如果用第一種方式對(duì)桌面端的網(wǎng)站進(jìn)行適配是肯定不行的。 簡(jiǎn)而言之，第一種方式面臨的問(wèn)題是非智能機(jī)的瀏覽器和臺(tái)式機(jī)的IE6等瀏覽器對(duì)HTML5和CSS的支持是存在問(wèn)題的。第二種方式，因?yàn)榘俣戎┲霙](méi)有區(qū)分移動(dòng)和桌面的蜘蛛，這樣在判斷跳轉(zhuǎn)上可能會(huì)出現(xiàn)問(wèn)題，從而對(duì)網(wǎng)站的排名和權(quán)重有不利的影響。第三種方式，其實(shí)是個(gè)無(wú)奈之選，但是從技術(shù)上絕對(duì)不是最佳之選。 移動(dòng)網(wǎng)站優(yōu)化技巧 下面的內(nèi)容主要是針對(duì)采用第三種方式的網(wǎng)站來(lái)給的建議。 1. response websites, that is, the web site's domain name and URL are the same, only automatically adjust the size and content of the page according to the browsing equipment, which is mainly implemented by HTML5 and CSS code. The domain name and URL of the 2. site are unchanged, but they are judged according to the user's equipment, and the different pages of the user, that is, the URL, are changed, but the HTML page has changed. 3. enable the new subdomain to be identified and then jump based on the user's device. The first way is the best way, but it is also the most difficult, and there are many challenges. Generally, there are third ways, which are not very good in terms of website optimization and cost, but the impact of objective reality is quite common. Also, the network speed in the domestic mobile network is still relatively slow, so the mobile site needs to be streamlined, if the first way to the desktop web site matching is certainly not possible. In short, the first problem is that the browser of non intelligent machines and desktop IE6 and other browsers support HTML5 and CSS. The second way, because Baidu spiders do not distinguish between mobile and desktop spiders, which may have problems in judging the jump, which has a negative impact on the ranking and weight of the web site. The third way is actually a helpless choice, but technically it is definitely not the best choice. Mobile website optimization techniques are mainly targeted at third ways to give advice.